Let's Talk Conspiracy Theories

Personally, I love a good conspiracy theory. At least ones that make me think. Though usually, I’m thinking these people are nuts! I’m not talking about the “aliens did it” theorist. There is absolutely no way our government could ever keep secret, for so long, something of this magnitude. Think about the ass hats in Washington purporting to represent us. You can’t honestly believe that any of these complete dumbasses kept THAT secret all these years? I mean, evidence of extra-terrestrial life? Come on, you wouldn’t trust them with Grandma’s secret Sunday biscuit recipe, let alone something of this magnitude.

                I don’t mean our government can’t keep secrets. They can, just not very well. Usually, our government slaps a classified label on the information or “evidence” and that’s that. If the evidence is unusually controversial or explosive? Then it’s time for the miss-information and defamation campaign to begin.

Case in point, the terrorist attack on our embassy in Benghazi and murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens. You can read more about the details here. A lot, and I mean a lot, has been proposed by the talking heads dominating media coverage of this incident. Given that one of the presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton, was Secretary of State, and therefore in charge of security for our ambassadors and embassies around the world, I can understand the interest.

My problem with the coverage and dissection of this attack? Aside from the miss-information and defamation campaign orchestrated by President Obama’s administration? And jumped on by the talking heads? We’re missing the point!

This is the conspiracy bit here. Our current President, who I’ll refer to as “Professor Dumbass” and should not be confused with his predecessor “Cowboy Dumbass”, made a decision. What was the decision? Not to send help. He made the decision to sacrifice our ambassador and his staff. (A bit understated, I know, but what ya gonna do?) The rest is just “smoke and mirrors” to keep his decision from “blowing up” in his face. (See what I did there?)

Why do I think this? How do I know? Well, you cannot possible believe our government is so impotent they couldn’t orchestrate a rescue? This attack, initially called a “protest” over an anti-Muslim video, Innocence of Muslims, lasted for hours. Hours people! Surely, we have the capability to respond with force in that timeframe. After all, while the Republicans protest the gutting of our military, the Democrats claim the administration was re-aligning our armed forces to address “current” or “modern” military needs. Such as the ability to respond to hotspots around the world. What happened with that? Did the administration just fail? NO!!!

Profession Dumbass made a call. It was a difficult and politically explosive call to make. Because we didn’t send in “the troops”, the situation didn’t escalate to all-out war. Not sending in “the troops” kept the bloodshed to a minimum. You don’t have to like Professor Dumbass’ decision, I certainly don’t, but we have to accept his call on the situation. He is our President, all of ours, something I think he forgets, a lot.

Unfortunately, and this is where I have a real problem, Professor Dumbass’ motivation wasn’t to keep the situation from escalating and the bloodshed from swelling into rivers. His administrations’ position on radical Islamic terrorism, not that they’d ever call it that, is we are winning. We’ve contained the Islamic terrorist state and they’re as good as finished. WTF? Delusional much? Because he wants to be the President of peace, good people were sacrificed! He won the Nobel Peace Prize for Christs sake! But to let good people die to further your agenda and pad your Presidential legacy and to allow radical Islamic terrorists to kill us without consequences, this is unacceptable! I know Professor Dumbass will never understand. It’s the problem all Ivory Tower Elites have, if it looks good on paper, it will work in the “real” world. While you and I understand this is almost never the case, the Ivory Tower Elites will never understand.

What about the two presidential hopefuls? Your guess is as good as mine. Sorry about that, but one was a major player in this conspiracy and has a track record that can only be looked on as suspect if not downright treasonable. She blamed an internet video for the “protest” knowing it was a planned attack. Later she took responsibility for the lack of embassy security in an interview with CNN saying “I’m responsible for diplomats’ security”. However, when questioned by the Benghazi House Committee she pulls a Sargent Shultz from Hogan’s Heroes and said “I know nothing, I see nothing”. So, what about the other one? He’s a mouthy blowhard who seems to speak in plain language, but doesn’t actually say much of anything. So, good luck with these two! We’re going to need it!

As always, this is just my opinion. You could be wrong!

[Insert Clever Title Here]

I’ll post these “lunatic rants” on a variety of subjects with varying degrees of competence and research. However, I wouldn’t expect any ground-breaking ideas or even coherence, if I were you. Though I will try to use proper grammar and keep the cursing to a minimum, (yep, that’s going to happen). And I’ll use spellcheck.

Where to start. Update the apps on my tablet. Ok, done. Spend an hour reading up on what are the best places to post my blog, check. Go smoke cigarettes, check. Pace around mumbling to myself, check. Watch Fox News blather on for a bit, check. Listen to the FBI news conference regarding the terror attack at Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, FL....

Oh god, my brain hurts. I swear the Feds just said they edited the 911 calls received from that nut job, Mateen, during his bullet ridden rampage at Pulse nightclub because, and I’m paraphrasing now, they didn’t want to give the murderous bastard any free publicity. He’s dead dumbass. He doesn’t need any publicity. Also, I pretty sure dead people aren’t concerned with their public image. There’s no que, at the end of it all, for updating your earthly profile. There’s just not!

If the Fed’s don’t want to use words and phrases like: terrorism, Radical Islamic terrorist, Allah, ISIS and many more I’m not going to bother to type, wouldn’t want to upset the NSA and all, fine, I’ll accept that. We all know the federal government edits what they tell us. After all, the federal government admitted they think the biggest threat to them is we the American people. And what’s with the us versus them mentality anyway? I thought it was “government for the people, by the people”. Better not let us come to any conclusions for ourselves, right?

Personally, when it comes to the federal government, I just want better lies from them. It’s like they think we’re ten years old or something. It’s insulting. This wasn’t a case of gun violence. The terrorist attack on the Pulse Night club was motivated by religion, Islam to be more specific. Mateen chose that place because it catered to the LBGT community. He murdered those people because they were gay or at the very least, associated themselves with the LBGT community and lifestyle. He was (thank God for him being a "was") a radical Islamic terrorist and not a homophobic psychopath. Mateen killed innocent people because their behavior didn’t follow the tenants of his religion. It’s as simple as that.

Why we cannot just admit this, is beyond me. Maybe we’re just afraid that if we identify these evil, blood thirsty, murderous bastards with Islam, we in the West will start to wonder if every Muslin we meet is a potential threat to us. Maybe we would, but at least for the moment, the active terrorists are Muslim and the Muslim world community doesn’t seem interested in stopping them. Can you imagine the outcry from the Christian community if these kind of terrorist attacks were committed in the name of Jesus?

Yes, President Obama can remind us again and again of atrocities committed in the name of Christianity. And yes, there were plenty. But what that useless wet fish he’s become fails to tell the world; those atrocities were committed hundreds of years ago. Medieval even, as in it happened during the middle ages. Not last week! Christians are mostly peaceful. Jews are mostly peaceful. Are Muslims? Yes, I think they are, but not because the Muslim leadership preaches such, but because, it’s who they are as individuals.

But where’s the outcry from the everyday Muslim? Why aren’t the moderate Muslims crying out the way the Christian community would? Because, and this is just my opinion, you could be wrong, they feel the radicals among them have a point. I think they feel slightly guilty that they’re not doing more to curb the perceived immoral behaviors they see around them. And it’s this Islamic teaching that’s the problem. Marking those who believe and act differently than you as evil and in need of punishment is the very definition of intolerant. And promising the Islamic terrorist rewards for taking action, all I can say to that is: WTF!!!

Now, my heart goes out to the LBGT community as it would with any group targeted because they are different, with the exception of the hate groups, they can all fuck off! But that’s what happened here. A group, in this case ISIS, holds as immoral and condemned, another group, in this case the LBGT community. So ISIS puts out propaganda inciting those with weak minds to kill in gods name. I think they offer virgins and such if you die killing non-believers! Not sure what the virgins think about being offered up as a reward, but the Muslim world doesn’t have the best track record when it comes to women, so the average Muslim probably wouldn’t care what she thought. Apparently, there are also training manuals and even videos on line to help the crazies (radical Islamic terrorists) act out. And by act out, I mean KILL YOU!

This next bit is for the hacker group Anonymous, CAN’T YOU SHUT THESE ASSHOLES DOWN? (I put this bit here in case they’re watching.) Paranoid much?

Let’s continue. Here’s an interesting thought to throw in at this point. Isn’t the god of Islam the same as the god of both the Jewish and Christian religions? And in many (most?) countries with Islam as the state religion, they stone to death or otherwise execute members of the LGBT community, right? And they do it because their god told them to kill these people. Well then, I guess we should all be happy that Christianity and Judaism don’t go about evangelizing the same way. Or maybe god just tells them to do other things with their time. Perhaps a bake sale or possibly a fish fry?

And why do we in the West continuously act surprised that someone from the Muslim religion might harbor evil, yes I said EVIL, thoughts towards us? And act on them! Modern terrorism started with that bastard Yassar Arafat as far back as the late 1950’s. He killed innocent women and children to affect change. And he was a Muslim right? Although, to be fair, I think his motivation was more political than religious. He hated the Jews and wanted a country for the Palestinian people. He just used Islam to justify his actions and unite the Palestinian people.

Another interesting fact: Abraham, you remember him from the bible, he’s acknowledged as the father of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Think not? You know that tomb in Mecca all Muslims need to pilgrimage to at least once? Well, who do you think is buried in that tomb? Abraham, that’s who. Now, repeat after me, “sibling rivalry”?

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not bashing the Islamic religion, at least not any more than I’ll bash the other two religions which think their way is the only WAY. That’s to say, I’ll beat them like a redheaded stepchild. Sorry to all the redheaded stepchildren out there. I obviously don’t condone child abuse. And don’t bother to email me or comment on that last bit, I know it’s offensive. It’s just an expression. Let it go. Besides, if you’ve read this far, you know there’s plenty more to troll over. I’ll leave you with this thought. The former president of Iran, Mahmoud Im-a-nut-job (it’s actually Ahmadinejad) said, in an address to the United Nations that Islam is a tolerant religion and they will kill anyone who says otherwise. While I paraphrased that, it is what he said.